The Assessment Process

Running Head : THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS[Name][University][Professor][Class] McLoughlin and Lewis (2005 ) stated in their discussion entitled Assessing Students with Special Needs that , learningal estimations are performed to hit in data in to make important educational finishs (p . 53 . This statement carries much weight to it especi ally if use to mark eligibility for surplus education and related service . A justly implemented and thorough assessment is an important cognitive operation as it can isolate and focus on a squirt s learning deadening Tools and assessment strategies can be optimized and plain customized so as to gather the relevant operable and developmental teaching on the specialiseds that can directly contemplate to heart in determining the educational needs of the pip-squeak with the net stoppin g point of overcoming that disability and become a generative citizenSpecial education assessment can only be prospered if its process sequence is logically followed in to ensure that the tuition gathered is veracious . Accuracy is of great significance if wiz is to make point in the development of the child through and through decisions in the educational program that will be followed . thither are 2 types of decisions that is needed to be done in this case . integrity is a legal decision and the otherwise is the instructional decision (McLoughlin Lewis 2005 ,. 34-35Determining the eligibility and granting the child access to special services are governed by right . Special services have federal documentation and therefore , certain legalities are concerned . One of the decisions to be made based on the results of the assessment in a legal one and certain removements mustiness first be met before allowing the allocation of special education funds , resources and vi olence . McLoughlin and Lewis (2005 cited th! at the 1997 IDEA Amendments , a federal special education law had specified two major eligibility criteria to wit that , the scholar must be determined to have a disability and that disability must have an adverse marrow of the student s educational death penalty (p . 34 .

around states , however , further require that the information of the assessments should at least(prenominal) provide (1 ) general intelligent functioning (2 educational performance , and (3 ) performance related to specific abilities (p . 34Both legal and instructional decisions would bank heavily on the pass of the assessment team wh o is tasked with study the student s expected performance against his actual performance with love to factors such as duration , grade and intellectual level . This is one of the determinants if the disability is apparentNot all assessment is approached academically . in that respect are also sluttish assessment procedures which , according to McLoughlin and Lewis (2005 would strike checklists , interviews , rating scales , observations portfolios , criterion-referenced tests and other light measures (which are ) are employ to confirm results of norm-references tests and to provide information not available from order measures (p . 35 Once the student has been deemed eligible , the instructional decisions take over . These would now involve the planning , monitoring and evaluating a program suitable to the child s needsAs mentioned earlier , following a logical...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPa per.com

If you want to get a full essay,! visit our page: write my paper