A People\'s Constitution

In the article A Peoples reputation, the author Howard Zinn explains his thoughts that the opus does non effect our quality of life. His call(a) is not backed up by any facts or logic, but purely cerebration by his own opinion. The shaping is in fact rattling useful to society because it gives citizens their rights and gives wad their liberty. The post-horse of Rights keeps the government and citizens friction match by making accepted the government does not subdue the tribe and keeps things concern.\nZinn argues that the integrity and intent of the people is what gives us our rights and provide. He states, It is conspicuously silent on certain other rights that all humans deserve. (Zinn, pg. 1) This statement contradicts itself because The one-ninth amendment explains that people have galore(postnominal) more rights than what is just give tongue to in our nature. He consequently goes on to talk astir(predicate) how thralldom came to be abolished. When slavery was abolished, it was not by original fiat, but by the get together of military necessity with the honourable force of a big antislavery movement, acting outside the Constitution and often against the law. (Zinn, pg. 1) The Thirteenth Amendment expands the license Proclamation which makes slavery hot in all of the joined States and gives everyone equal freedom and rights. The Constitution is very effective in keeping our people equal and even though it did not clearly state this at first, it has been in tact since. Since the people fought for what they believed in, the government compromised and added it to the Constitution.\nZinn argues that the laws that protect citizens from overly much government power are easily ignored. The Bill of Rights is very effective, giving citizens the freedom of speech, religion, and press all in The First Amendment. Whatever a distant Court \ndecided, the sure right of citizens to free rule has been determined by the straightaway power of th e local jurisprudence on th...