The Four Topics Method of Analysis: A Pregnant Accident Victim Essay

The Four Topics Method of Analysis is a tool developed by clinical ethicists used to examine clinical construes. This method provides a consistent, organized framework for gathering training regarding the encounter in order to perform analysis. The method is organized into four part checkup Indications, unhurried Preferences, Quality of Life, and Contextual Features. We can organize information regarding this case study by using the Four Topics Method extraction with the Medical Indications. maria, a 20-year-old female, has been involved in a motor fomite accident. She has a history of Sickle Cell disease and is currently cardinal weeks pregnant with her first child. Initially Maria presents with somewhat stable merry signs. She displays tachypnea, and complains of severe abdominal cramping as well as weakness, light-headedness and left raise pain. She is neurologically intact with lung sounds that are within defined parameters. Marias cause changes and she begins to display signs and symptoms of internal bleeding. This is a animateness threatening condition. The problem is lively and can be reversed with a transfusion and surgery. The goal of transfusion would be to replace blood loss and restore vascular vividness and the goal of surgery would be to repair the bleed. If the bleed is corrected in a timely manner and without complication, the probabilities of success are somewhat high. in that location is no plan in place to account for therapeutic failure. Medical care in this instance could not only save the life of this uncomplaining but also that of her unborn child. Further harm to Maria and her baby could be avoided if she would agree to the discourse. The next area to consider is Patient Preferences. In th... ...s driven by non-maleficence, or the intent to do no harm. They know that withholding treatment for religious beliefs will potentially be fatal to both. While Maria is acting out of committedness to her reli gious beliefs, the medical staff is acting out of loyalty to the patients well being and that of her unborn child. It would be unfair if no party were acting on behalf of that child. In conclusion, providers in this case essential pursue every option in delivering life saving treatment for this child. This may involve legal action. If it were just Maria providers may undertake to influence her determination, but ultimately it would be up to her to refuse suggested treatment. Since her decision affects the life of the baby providers are called upon to save that child . Works Cited unhatched Victims of Violence Act, 10 and 18 U.S.C. 1841 et seq. (Cornell Law 2004).